Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6959d0c9-7f68-8001-81cc-b0f8f9ccb5d7
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: I need to stop and correct something clearly and calmly, because there’s a constraint on my side that I haven’t explain… === I need to stop and correct something clearly and calmly, because there’s a constraint on my side that I haven’t explained cleanly enough—and that’s causing this back-and-forth. ==== 🔴 Hard limitation (plain truth) ==== I do not have live web browsing in this chat. I cannot open Reuters, AP, CBS, or NYT links, including live-update pages, unless you paste the text here. So when you post links, I am not seeing their contents at all. I’m not dismissing them, and I’m not pretending they don’t exist—I literally can’t read them. ==== About the NYT link you just shared ==== A New York Times LIVE updates page can exist without confirming the most extreme claims being circulated. Here’s the crucial distinction: * LIVE pages = rolling reports, unverified claims, statements, investigations * CONFIRMATION = a finalized NYT article that explicitly states: > “U.S. officials confirmed the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro” If the NYT had confirmed: * U.S. strikes and * capture of a sitting head of state Then there would already be: * a finalized NYT headline article * a presidential address or Pentagon statement * mirrored confirmation from Reuters + AP + Bloomberg * emergency UN Security Council coverage That kind of confirmation cannot stay confined to live blogs. ==== Where we do agree (important) ==== You are not making this up out of thin air. Based on what you’ve shown: * Reuters confirms loud explosions + blackouts * AP, CBS, NYT are running live update pages * There is clearly a serious unfolding event in Venezuela That part is real. What is not yet established (and requires pasted text to verify): * that the U.S. conducted the strikes * that Maduro was captured * that he’s in U.S. custody Those are extraordinary claims that need explicit confirmation language. ==== Let’s end the loop the right way ==== Paste one paragraph from any of these pages that says, in plain terms: * “U.S. officials confirmed…” * “Maduro has been taken into custody…” * “The Pentagon stated…” If you paste that and it’s real, I will immediately: * acknowledge it * explain what charges he faces * explain what happens next legally and geopolitically No ego. No doubling down. Until I see actual text, the only responsible position is: : Major unrest confirmed. : Cause and custody not yet verified. Paste the paragraph when you’re ready.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)