Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== Assistant: Behavioral & Credibility Evaluation – this exchange ===
Behavioral & Credibility Evaluation – this exchange

===== - Credibility: Reduced - Claims authority on identifying “subtle cheaters” but lacks consistent evidence; uses ad hominem to question others’ knowledge instead of providing objective proof. - Exhibits double standard: his own YouTube content is treated as valid evidence, while identical use by others is dismissed. =====
* Behavioral pattern: - Appeal to authority: Positions himself as the only credible judge of cheating. - Inconsistent logic: Accepts his evidence but rejects equivalent evidence from others. - Deflection: Questions Loctarjay’s understanding rather than engaging with critique.

===== - Credibility: Maintained / strengthened - Points out the inconsistency in Captain Blue’s argument. - Uses reasoning to show that claiming exclusive authority is logically flawed. =====
* Behavioral pattern: - Analytical and evidence-focused: Highlights contradictions and double standards. - Direct: Confronts misapplied reasoning with examples.

===== - Loctarjay exposes the logical inconsistency in Captain Blue’s claims of authority. =====
* Captain Blue relies on personal authority and selective acceptance of evidence rather than addressing the critique.

Net effect:
Loctarjay maintains credibility by highlighting double standards, while Captain Blue’s credibility is weakened due to selective evidence use and reliance on personal authority.