Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

=== User: Open Questions and Weaknesses Needing Clarification ===
Open Questions and Weaknesses Needing Clarification

I have started with the weakness:
# No Clear Mathematical Mapping to General Relativity

This is because GR explains gravity as a geometrical property of space and time. QAT explains gravity also by a geometrical property that forms 3D space and time. As far as I know, the maths of GR is not 3D in the sense that it is representing a 3D process. I do not believe a new theory like QAT should replace GR or prove Einstein wrong. What is should do is go back to three-dimensional physics. It should simplify by explaining a simple 3D process. Spherical symmetry is used to simplify Einstein’s field equation. Could Schwarzschild metric and FLRW metric help?  

A new theory should explanation an underlying cause for the curvature of spacetime. How energy- mass causes the curvature of spacetime. If spactime curvature is proportional to the energy-mass distribution in spacetime, could it be photon energy exchange with the electron?  
Momentum 4 vector, 3 dimensions of space 1 dimension of time. Spherical geometry 3 dimensional interior, 1 dimensional outer surface. 

In Einstein’s Field Equation on the left we have minus ½ on the right 8πG divided by C^4. This is odd, because in Quantum Mechanics we a ½ in the form of an electron spin that in QAT is formed by a geometrical process by the radius of a sphere being have the diameter. Many properties are inverse in this process; I like to think of an inverse sphere a being inside the sphere looking out. If it was plus ½ on the left side, could we cancel it out and half the 8πand C^4?

If we could it would give us 4πG/c² pointing toward the geometry of light sphere that have to be squared? 
Divergence Theorem r² is cancelled out?
    
Both the Fine Structure Constant and General Relativity involve fundamental constants. 

I have found this: Fine-Structure Constant for Gravitational and Scalar Interactions
a – G=Gm₁m₂/(ћc) 
Also found: The fine structure constant is not directly a part of General Relativity, but it does play a role in understanding relativistic effects and coupling constants within the framework of curved spacetime, which is relevant to General Relativity. It is linked to the interaction between electromagnetism and quantum mechanics and can be used to analyze relativistic effects in scenarios involving gravity, such as the Dirac-Schwarzschild problem.

Found this connection between FSC and GR 
The fine structure constant appears in the analysis of the Dirac-Schwarzschild problem, where it helps to calculate the energy levels of bound states in this curved spacetime.
Relativistic effects, like those arising from spacetime curvature, can be analyzed using the fine structure constant as a parameter.
For instance, the splitting of energy levels in the hydrogen atom due to relativistic corrections and spacetime curvature can be studied using the fine structure constant.

I have found this: Chameleon theories of physics –variation of a over cosmological time could be connected to cosmollgical redshift and the effects described by GR?

Personally I believe Plasma plays a major roll at high temperatures and large scales. This can be based on the conformal geometry of QAT with the movement of charges. The spherical symmetry breaks forming the curvature of spacetime. Just as the curvature forms complexity relative to the atoms at the small scale it forms complexity at the large scale in the form of Plasma double layers, sheets, filaments and cellular structure. This is very similar to the ‘Electric Universe Theory, but it arises out of QM and keeps GR. I always think that the EUT needs a deeper understanding of electricity LOL. 

The other thing that needs to be looked into is Riemannian geometry
  Could the curvature of spacetime arise out of the Riemannian sphere?
I made a video about this many years ago. 

    
 Look at the links between Huygens' principle and GR?

Could we reinterpret how Huygens' principle and GR are linked based on the geometrical process of QAT 

 I have found: Einstein used Huygens' principle to derive the bending of light by gravity, and it plays a role in analyzing wave propagation in curved spacetimes.

If we believe gravity is a secondary force to the EM force, gravity cannot bend light. What I believe might be happening is internal reflection. We can set up experiments that will bend light using internal reflection. Just like Newton’s apple falling to the ground, this is not just a regional process in is universal. Could you look into this idea? 

What we could be seeing is internal reflection photon by photon relative to the reference frames or the objects that the light waves are passing by.