Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69566be9-e9c0-8009-992a-722fd2764e7a
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes, they still hold, but they operate differently because the local “socially acceptable” position and elite cues diff… === Yes, they still hold, but they operate differently because the local “socially acceptable” position and elite cues differ by country. # Moral loading / social desirability * Still present, but the direction depends on what is “respectable” in that country. * In Italy, where skepticism about escalation/costs is comparatively more normal in mainstream discourse, social desirability pressure may be weaker and less uniformly pro-EU, but it does not disappear. * Net: still tends to understate hard dissent (e.g., openly Russia-sympathetic views), but may not strongly inflate pro-EU support. # Elite cueing / media saturation * This is country-specific. If elites are divided or if major parties/media normalize “stop support / push peace,” cueing can push against EU policy. * Italy’s elite environment has been more mixed than, say, Poland or the Baltics. * Net: cueing can reduce pro-EU skew, or even skew anti-EU on some framings. # Abstraction / low personal cost * Still holds everywhere: abstract “support Ukraine” is easier than “pay costs / accept risks.” * In Italy, if people are already cost-sensitive, the drop from abstract to concrete may be even steeper. * Net: standard toplines can still overstate willingness to bear EU-policy costs, even among skeptics. # Cross-national comparability * Still holds, and Italy is a good example: “peace” may mean “negotiate soon, even if Ukraine concedes,” which is not what it means in some eastern states. * Net: you can’t read identical response options as identical preferences across countries. # Hidden minority effects * Still holds: even if Italy is more skeptical, some positions remain stigmatized (explicitly pro-Russia; endorsing aggression). * Net: the poll can still underestimate the hard edge of anti-EU / pro-Russia sentiment while capturing broader “aid fatigue.” Bottom line: the mechanisms remain, but Italy’s baseline is different, so the same biases don’t necessarily push strongly toward EU policy there. What you should assume is not “Italy is immune,” but “Italy’s social norm and elite cues are different—so direction and magnitude of skew are different.”
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)