Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/694c32ff-4db8-8006-a42d-34dfb80b14ea
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 2. Income growth by income group (“tax brackets” in practice) ==== Best long-run breakdown is from tax-file data (Distributional National Accounts) analysed by Xuereb et al. for Canadians for Tax Fairness and the World Inequality Lab. WID - World Inequality Database<ref>{{cite web|title=WID - World Inequality Database|url=https://prod.wid.world/www-site/uploads/2023/12/WorldInequalityLab_WP2023_27_Income-inequality-in-Canada_Final-1.pdf|publisher=WID - World Inequality Database|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> They look at tax filers grouped by income share, 1982–2022: * Bottom 50% of tax filers * Middle / upper-middle: 50–99% (everyone except the top 1%) * Top 1% * Top 0.01% (the ultra-rich, ~3,000 people in 2022) ===== 2.1 Nominal (before inflation) vs “real” (after inflation) ===== First they compare nominal income growth to CPI growth, then compute real growth. Over 1982–2022: taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> | Group (approx. tax “bracket”) | Nominal after-tax income increase | Real income growth after inflation | | ------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | | Bottom 50% (“lower brackets”) | +254% | ≈ +29% real | | 50–99% (excluding top 1%) (“middle & upper-middle brackets”) | +242% | ≈ +24% real | | Top 1% (“top bracket”) | +511% | ≈ +122% real | | Top 0.01% (“ultra-top sliver”) | +942% | ≈ +279% real | | CPI (cost of living) | +175% | — | How to read this: * Bottom 50% - Money in their pockets (after tax) is about 3.5× higher than in 1982 (254% increase). - But prices are ~2.75× higher (175%). Once you strip out inflation, real income for the bottom half is up only ~29% over forty years — less than 1% per year on average. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> * Middle / upper-middle (50–99%) - After-tax incomes up ~242% in nominal terms, so margin over inflation is only ~24% real for forty years. - They’ve done slightly better than the bottom half, but not by much. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> * Top 1% - After-tax incomes have risen ~511% – roughly 6×. - After inflation, that’s about +122% real – more than double their early-1980s purchasing power. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> * Top 0.01% - After-tax incomes up ~942% – roughly 11×. - Real purchasing power up around +279%. Put differently: for the bottom 99%, income has only slightly outpaced prices; for the top 1%, income has exploded. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> ===== 2.2 Market income (before taxes & transfers) vs cost growth ===== If you look at market income alone (labour + capital before tax and transfers), the bottom half actually loses to inflation: taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> * CPI: +175% (prices up 2.75×) * Bottom 50% market income: +150% (incomes up 2.5×) * Top 1% market income: +513% * Top 0.01% market income: +951% So: '' Bottom 50%: market incomes have grown ''slower* than costs. Their modest real gains come mainly from tax/transfer policy (child benefits, GST credits, etc.), not the labour market. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref> * Top 1%+: market incomes grow 3–5× faster than prices, even before you adjust for tax cuts at the top. taxfairness.ca<ref>{{cite web|title=taxfairness.ca|url=https://www.taxfairness.ca/en/resources/reports/canadas-affordability-divide-how-1s-rise-left-millions-behind|publisher=taxfairness.ca|access-date=2025-12-25}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)