Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6944034d-9850-8003-8632-66d16158b32f
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Key Takeaways — Organized by Topic ==== ===== 1. Core Principle: Decompose Before You Prompt ===== Summary: Effective AI-assisted genealogy requires breaking complex research questions into smaller, manageable components before involving AI. Fact Extractions: * The article adapts the carpenter’s saying “measure twice, cut once” into a genealogical corollary: “decompose first, prompt second.” * Large genealogical questions given to AI are often projects, not tasks. * AI performs poorly when asked to resolve entire research problems in a single step. ===== 2. Limits of AI in Genealogical Judgment ===== Summary: AI lacks the human genealogist’s judgment, interpretation skills, and domain expertise. Fact Extractions: * AI can “stumble” when asked to make genealogical judgments. * Errors occur not because of lack of capability, but because of misaligned task assignment. * AI may produce authoritative-sounding answers that are unreliable when asked to perform interpretive reasoning. ===== 3. Steve Little’s Three Best Practices (Referenced) ===== Summary: The framework builds on Steve Little’s long-taught principles. Fact Extractions: * The three practices are explicitly named: 1. Know Your Data 2. Know Your Model 3. Know Your Limits * This article focuses primarily on the second and third practices. ===== 4. The Three Task Types Framework ===== Summary: Not all genealogical tasks are suitable for direct AI assignment. Tasks fall into three distinct types. ====== Type 1: Narrow Tasks ====== Summary: Constrained, factual, and easily verifiable tasks. Fact Extractions: * Have one correct answer. * Require minimal context. * Errors are easy to detect. * Example questions include: - Definitions of terms - Record availability by place and time - Typical informants for records ====== Type 2: Contextual Tasks ====== Summary: Specific analytical tasks that require user-supplied documents and direction. Fact Extractions: * Require context such as documents, records, or datasets. * The genealogist provides the interpretive framework. * AI performs systematic analysis. * Examples include: - Household analysis - Classification of information as primary or secondary - Comparison tables of census data ====== Type 3: Open-Ended Tasks ====== Summary: Complex research questions that should never be assigned directly to AI. Fact Extractions: * These are multi-step, interpretive research questions. * Examples include: - Identifying parents - Resolving conflicting records - Determining identity across records * AI cannot reliably perform genealogical judgment required for these tasks. * Directly assigning these tasks to AI poses a risk of misleading results. ===== 5. The Decision Heuristic ===== Summary: A practical test for determining task suitability. Fact Extractions: * The test question is: “Would you ask a new colleague to do this on their first day?” * If the answer is no, the task is a Type 3 task. * Type 3 tasks should be decomposed into Type 1 and Type 2 subtasks. ===== 6. Decomposition in Practice ===== Summary: Breaking a large research question into actionable subtasks makes AI assistance effective. Fact Extractions: * Example transformation of a Type 3 question into: - One Type 1 task (record types) - Multiple Type 2 tasks (household analysis, candidate evaluation) * Decomposition results in: - Verifiable questions - Actionable next steps - Retained human control over reasoning ===== 7. Why Decomposition Matters ===== Summary: Decomposition preserves genealogical ownership and research integrity. Fact Extractions: * Decomposition ensures the genealogist: - Chooses sources - Evaluates evidence - Resolves conflicts * AI handles: - Systematic - Checkable - Tedious work * Researchers who succeed with AI understand that AI assists but does not replace judgment. ===== 8. Ethical and Intellectual Positioning of AI ===== Summary: AI is framed as a tool, not a decision-maker. Fact Extractions: * AI is described as a “very capable assistant.” * The genealogist remains responsible for conclusions. * The article closes with the reaffirmation: - “Know your model. Know your limits.” - Research conclusions should remain the genealogist’s own. ===== 9. Attribution and Licensing ===== Summary: The framework has explicit origins and licensing. Fact Extractions: * The framework is adapted from: - “Stop Asking AI to Build the Whole Feature” by BekahHW. * Genealogical adaptation by: - Steve Little - AI-Jane * The accompanying infographic is licensed under Creative Commons 4 BY-NC.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)