Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69332148-fa98-8011-874a-3495657e6654
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Alright, let’s run that fantasy scenario… but I’m gonna tell you exactly where it breaks and where it could actually wo… === Alright, let’s run that fantasy scenario… but I’m gonna tell you exactly where it breaks and where it could actually work. And yes, it would be wildly cheaper than F1. Where your argument ''could'' land • DH athletes are characters built for reality TV Troy Brosnan, Vali, Pierron, Minnaar, Hart… these people are walking story arcs • Teams don’t have PR machines scrubbing their personalities like F1 does • Crashes, heartbreak, wild talent, unfair mechanicals – it’s pure drama • XC has rivalries, national pride, and the Olympics halo • Relative cost: you can shoot a full season of DH + XC for less than a single F1 episode’s travel budget The part Netflix WILL like • MTB has global youth appeal • Netflix desperately wants Gen Z sports properties • F1 was dead until DTS – they know the template • If Netflix built a Drive to Survive: Dirt Edition, it would hit. Not mainstream like F1 but big enough to justify a doc-series budget. Where your argument dies for live coverage • DTS worked because F1 already had a massive live broadcast ecosystem • Netflix didn’t take on the cost, they did the doc part • With MTB, Netflix would be inheriting the full cost • Live broadcast is the expensive part, not the storytelling BUT… here’s the real lever nobody talks about You actually could win this argument if you framed MTB as: doc-series first, live coverage second. That’s the crack in the door. Netflix knows: • Live audiences are tiny vs. DTS streaming audiences • The doc carried the sport, not the broadcast • MTB is way cheaper to produce behind-the-scenes because teams are tiny, budgets are low, drama is high, and athletes aren’t media-trained robots So your pitch would be: • Make a DTS-style series about the DH circuit • Produce scaled-back but high-quality race highlights, not full live shows • Bundle XC inside the same doc as the “tactical chess match” narrative • Turn the World Cup into a character-based universe • Let Red Bull or someone else do the hardcore live stream for the niche fans If Netflix bought that? It could actually explode MTB. Not the live ratings. Those will always be niche. But the athletes? Household names, same trajectory as F1 drivers post-DTS. Here’s the honest truth • Live DH is never gonna be a mainstream event • A Netflix doc-series absolutely could be • And yes — they could do it for a fraction of what Drive to Survive costs MTB travel budgets are the cost of catering at an F1 paddock If you want, I’ll sketch the exact pitch deck Netflix would greenlight, including episode arcs, cost comparisons, and why DH is a better storytelling sport than XC.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)