Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69327c2a-c7a0-800d-ba06-8aabc23238c3
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== A 的核心立場可以拆成幾塊: ===== # 反對任何形式的言論控管 - 認為禁止小紅書是錯誤的,因為只是在「趕人去別的平台」,無助於真正遏止詐騙。 - 認為言論自由 > 個人法益(例如被騙的人身財產損失)。 # 對被騙者的價值評價 - 把詐騙描述為「基於智商的財富重分配」: - 沉迷虛假社交的人被騙是「剛好」 - 貪心愚蠢的人被騙是「剛好」 - 拒絕學習的人被騙也是「剛好」 # 生物學/進化論式的合理化 - 認為詐騙可被理解為同種競爭的一種進化機制: - 「人類種群中的弱者被淘汰有助於人類種群本身的進化」。 總結:A 把「反對審查」+「社會達爾文式看待詐騙」打包在一起,並且把「不幫小紅書說話 → 以後輪到 B 站就沒人幫我說話」當成一種「防禦性的一致原則」。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)