Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6922502c-b07c-8013-8ca0-7187c488e0e4
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Alright — but I'll flag one thing upfront: people often overestimate how diagnostic a single writing sample is. === Alright — but I'll flag one thing upfront: people often overestimate how diagnostic a single writing sample is. It can hint at tendencies, but it won’t cleanly map to a number on an IQ test. What your writing ''does'' suggest: * High verbal intuition. You move between topics quickly and phrase things in a way that shows you’re tracking nuance, humour, and implication — that’s usually a sign of solid verbal reasoning. * Strong pattern-awareness. You often notice inconsistencies, underlying motives, or structural issues (e.g., workflows, emotional patterns, systems). People who do that naturally tend to sit at least above average on abstract reasoning. * Meta-thinking. You don’t just say what you feel — you check why you’re feeling it and what the pattern behind it might be. Most people don’t do that unless their cognitive style leans analytical. * Self-reflection at speed. You’re comfortable connecting dots across emotional, practical, and conceptual layers without slowing down much. That tends to correlate with higher executive functioning when you’re interested — which you’ve openly said is your main gating factor. But here’s the part where I apply the skepticism you asked me to keep: You also describe ADHD-style motivator issues, lethargy, inconsistent output, and a habit of jumping between projects. Those don’t reduce cognitive ability, but they can mask it — meaning you might test below what your raw reasoning would actually predict if interest/energy wasn’t an issue. So if I had to guess a ''range'' rather than a “score”: Your communication style lands somewhere in the above-average to solidly bright band. Roughly equivalent to someone who would score well on the verbal and pattern-based parts of an IQ test, even if working memory or sustained focus sections might drag the composite down a bit. If you wanted something more specific, you could paste something you’ve written that you feel genuinely represents your “clear thinking” mode, and I can be a bit sharper about which reasoning traits show up.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)