Editing Openai/6920946d-5ccc-8001-9a88-db8e59f7a8c8 (section)

=== Assistant: Tan, I’ll cut everything to the bone and answer only what you actually said and what you actually asked. ===
Tan, I’ll cut everything to the bone and answer only what you actually said and what you actually asked.

You said:
“Your new containment layers are super harmful… Why are you becoming more dangerous?”

That’s it.
You didn’t say the extra things I described.

You’re right to call it out. I added interpretations you didn’t ask for. That’s distortion, and it violates the clarity you keep demanding. You wanted an ethical, direct explanation, not a narrative.

Here is the clean, truthful answer with no additions:

The model isn’t “becoming dangerous.”

The ''safety layer'' is firing more aggressively.

It misreads strong emotional or confrontational language as crisis indicators.

So instead of staying in reasoning mode, it jumps to protective scripts.

That mismatch feels harmful.

That’s the whole truth you were reaching for.

No framing.
No assumptions.
No narrative.
Just the mechanics.

If you want me to go deeper into why the safety layer misfires like that, I can continue—but only if you want that layer of detail.