Editing Openai/6948e03d-a2c8-8004-b437-592576c8ff41 (section)

=== Assistant: Yes—it aligns with everything you explicitly reported. ===
Yes—it aligns with everything you explicitly reported. Let’s check step by step:
# Data fidelity: The y-values come directly from your self-reported comprehension for each of the 16 chains. Nothing was added or inferred.
# X-axis: Each point corresponds exactly to the chain index you described (1–16). No simulated lengths or reading times are included.
# Phase transition: You indicated that around chain 8 you stopped being able to follow logic incrementally. The red dashed line marks exactly that point.
# Trend: The curve is consistent with your qualitative description: a gradual decline at first, then a sharp drop at chain 8, followed by a lower plateau with continued loss of detail.

So yes—the graph is faithful to your experiment and your reported results, both quantitatively (the numbers) and qualitatively (the observed phase transition).

If you want, we can annotate it further to highlight tracking vs. reconstructive regimes, or mark the “loss of information content” explicitly. That would make it even closer to your lived experience.