Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693a6e5e-1a04-8012-a8a7-a701feb20662
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== E) Strategic Recommendations β Code / Credo / Rights ===== ====== 1) Shared cross-institution βTop 5β ====== # Transparent Governance Dashboards (Code + Rights) - Annual, public dashboards with: - Funding and donor patterns - COI declarations and enforcement - Misconduct / harassment cases (anonymised) and resolution times - Climate metrics (emissions, energy use, travel, procurement) # Access & Affordability Guarantees (Rights + Credo) - Clear, simple guarantee statements for low- and middle-income students (βIf X, then your total costs will not exceed Yβ). - Expanded online/hybrid options and micro-credentials for global learners. # Mental Health & Workload Rebalancing (Rights) - Systematic redesign of workloads for students and early-career staff. - Minimum support standards across all departments/colleges, with monitoring and feedback. # AI & Data Governance Charters (Code + Rights) - Explicit rules on how learning analytics, proctoring, admissions tools, HR algorithms, and research AIs can be used. - Strong privacy and contestation rights (appeals, explanations, human override). # Expectation Audits (U-Model universal) For each critical process (admission, assessment, hiring, discipline, AI use): - What do people rightfully expect? - Are we meeting it in practice? - If not, what policy + process + data changes close the gap? ====== 2) Harvard-specific actions ====== * Leverage ESG & business strengths for public good - Use the business and innovation ecosystem to create global equity initiatives: low-cost programmes, joint degrees with public universities in lower-income regions, and outcome-based scholarships. * Strengthen protection from undue influence - Tighten and surface rules on corporate and political involvement in research agendas and teaching content. * Make well-being a performance metric - Reward departments not only for publications and funding, but also for student and staff well-being indicators. ====== 3) Oxford-specific actions ====== * Standardise rights across colleges - A minimum, enforceable Rights & Protections baseline that every college must meet (housing, support, anti-harassment, mental health). * Turbocharge applied innovation - Translate strength in ethics and global policy into more applied innovation labs addressing SDGs, with clear impact metrics. * Housing & living-cost protections - Targeted housing solutions and stipends for low-income and international students to reduce exclusion by cost.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)