Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69401093-f800-800a-94fc-a5d69db9f764
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== 7. コモディティ/希少資産の位置づけ:有効だが“主役ではなく、金融の一部門” ==== ご自身が既に言い切っている通り、希少資産の大量保管は「方策の一つ」であり、国家スケールの主役にはなりにくい。ここは整理が非常に良いです。 加えてご質問の「管理費用」も、当然に収益を削ります。希少資産・現物コモディティには概ね次が乗ります。 * 保管(倉庫・温湿度・セキュリティ) * 保険(盗難・火災・輸送) * 劣化・整備(名車等は維持費が資産価格に影響) * 真贋・履歴監査(プロヴェナンス) * 流動性コスト(売却に時間・手数料) * 税務(保有・譲渡・相続) したがって、これは「現物を持つ戦略」ではなく、最終的には '''金融(ファンド化、保管インフラ、国際販売網)'''に接続して“産業”にしないとスケールしません。ここでも結局、ウォール街型の機能が要ります。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)