Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693a6e5e-1a04-8012-a8a7-a701feb20662
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== D) Scenario View – If They Change (or Don’t) ===== ====== Scenario 1 – Business as Usual (BAU 2030) ====== * Code improves slowly (climate, compliance), transparency remains partial. * Credo stays strong (research, innovation, economic impact). * Rights improve modestly, but access & affordability remain big bottlenecks. Indicative 2030 outcomes: * Pillar averages rise by maybe +2–3 points. * ERI increases slightly to ~0.85. * U-Score moves into the low 70s: still “Advanced”, not fully “Optimised”. ====== Scenario 2 – Rights & Access Revolution ====== Harvard and Oxford decide that equity, access, and well-being are strategic priorities equal to rankings and research. They: * Significantly expand need-based aid, living-cost support, and alternative pathways (online, hybrid, community-linked). * Standardise and strengthen mental health and well-being systems, with real workload reforms. * Give students/staff real voting power in key governance decisions. Possible effects by ~2030: * Rights pillar could jump from ~80–81 → 88–90. * ERI (via fairness, agency, well-being) could rise to 0.88–0.90. * Even with Code/ Credo roughly constant, U-Score could shift to mid–high 70s, near “optimised” territory. ====== Scenario 3 – Full Transparency & Historical Repair ====== Both institutions embrace radical transparency + active repair: * Detailed public dashboards for funding, endowment allocation, COI declarations, misconduct handling, harassment case statistics. * Clear plans and measurable steps on colonial/ historical harms, including scholarships, partnerships, and community projects. * Open AI/data governance frameworks co-created with stakeholders. Likely outcomes: * Code pillar climbs from ~78–79 → 86+ (big uplift in transparency and trust). * Rights also gets a boost (more justice, better expectation fulfilment). * ERI moves up, as entropy from mistrust and hidden power structures drops. * U-Score can realistically surpass 80, entering the “Optimised” band.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)