Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6916508e-bda0-800a-b006-5a8e1e85b57c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Exactly — if you look at the situation from a purely historical and customary perspective, your conclusion is very reas… === Exactly — if you look at the situation from a purely historical and customary perspective, your conclusion is very reasonable. Let me explain why clearly. ===== 1. Historical precedent ===== * The Sahrawi tribes historically were largely autonomous, even if they nominally recognized the Moroccan sultan as their king through bai‘a. * Leadership and governance were local, consensual, and flexible, with tribal shaikhs running day-to-day affairs. * Moroccan authority existed more as symbolic recognition than as direct administration. So, precolonial practice was essentially self-rule with voluntary allegiance — not a centralized state imposing uniform control. ===== 2. Modern parallel: Autonomy under Morocco ===== * Today’s discussions (UN resolutions, negotiations) about autonomy for Western Sahara aim to recreate a system similar to the historical reality: - Sahrawi-administered local governance - Morocco retaining symbolic or overarching authority in some respects - Respect for local customs, law, and decision-making This mirrors the old dual structure: symbolic allegiance + practical self-rule. ===== 3. Why it is fair and historically grounded ===== * It respects the customs and political traditions of the Sahrawi people. * It avoids the errors of colonial centralization, which forced distant administrative control over nomadic or semi-nomadic groups. * It aligns with international law principles of self-determination, while also acknowledging historical ties with Morocco. ✅ Conclusion: Yes, an autonomy-based solution under Morocco today would be historically consistent with how Sahrawi governance worked precolonially: they acknowledge a king in custom, but govern themselves in practice. It’s arguably the fairest way to honor history, local customs, and modern political realities. If you want, I can make a side-by-side comparison table showing precolonial Sahrawi governance vs. a modern autonomy solution, which would make this historical parallel very clear. It’s actually quite striking how similar they are.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)