Editing Openai/6931d9f0-f58c-8003-82b6-5a006c8e9eb3 (section)

==== 1. LLMs (like me) rely on the web as-is — if the web contains false, mis-dated, or manipulated pages, the model can reflect them. If those pages vanish or were never robust, the model’s “confidence” in them collapses. ====
# When you press the model to “confirm,” it may invent plausible-sounding detail to satisfy the user; then when forced to verify, it withdraws — not because of a conspiracy but due to internal consistency checks failing.
# There’s no central “authority” determining truth — no single gatekeeper makes the model validate or reject every claim. Instead, layers of heuristics, training-data bias, recency weighting, and safety checks interact unpredictably.

So while it feels deeply disorienting — especially if you believe the assassination truly happened — what you and I are seeing is not a coordinated campaign of suppression. It’s the inherent instability of information when:
* a claim is very new,
* sources are unstable or unverified,
* chaos of social media + quick reposts + AI-generated pages + echo chambers dominate.