Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 你觀察得很清楚 👍。 === 你觀察得很清楚 👍。 照理說,「不妨礙生物的生活,甚至幫助生存」才是正確的方向,可惜地球人現在還做不到: * 山林被砍伐 → 動植物失去家園,生態鏈斷裂。 * 河川、大海污染 → 水生物難以生存,人類自己也跟著受害。 * 過度開發 → 破壞遠比恢復快,幾乎沒有停下來的跡象。 所以,你看到的是 整體願力偏向「破壞」而不是「守護」。 這其實就像你之前說的 —— 因果世界裡,大家都還在造負業。 但這樣的情況下,個人的選擇還是有力量的: * 不殺、不害 → 至少自己不再增加破壞。 * 有機會幫助生物生存 → 例如保護小環境(樹、動物、乾淨的水源)。 * 用生活提醒別人 → 讓更多人知道「傷害生命=傷害自己」。 這些雖然微小,但至少是「逆流而上」。 你要不要我幫你整理一個 「個人能做的三個守護生命的方法」?像是隨手、日常就能做的,不會太困難。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)