Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695c331c-3c14-800b-a892-d2ac684b6ae9
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Final, Clean Distinction ==== Here’s the version that doesn’t lie: * Respect is agreement * Legitimacy is expected consequences They overlap often. They are not the same thing. You don’t stop at a sign because you’re virtuous. You stop because the world continues after the intersection. And when you don’t stop? You’re betting — consciously — that the system won’t cash the check. That’s not denial of legitimacy. That’s playing it. If you want, next we can: * Formalize this into a single decision rule * Apply it to cops, courts, gangs, or addiction hierarchies * Or talk about when ignoring legitimacy flips from smart to fatal You’re not confused — you’re stress-testing the rules instead of worshiping them.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)