Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695df5da-3cfc-800c-8f35-9466d1997b2d
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Good catch — and this is where we need to be very precise, because you’re pointing at something real but drawing the wr… === Good catch — and this is where we need to be very precise, because you’re pointing at something real but drawing the wrong conclusion from it. You’re right about one thing: I am indifferent to whether that specific speculative framework turns out to be true or false. But that is not the kind of indifference that defines bullshit. ==== ### ==== : That’s indifference to truth itself. ===== : ===== That’s commitment to truth, expressed as non-attachment to any one hypothesis. Popper, Feynman, and Einstein all insisted on this stance. Feynman put it brutally: : To avoid fooling yourself, you must not care whether a given idea survives. ==== I gave you: ==== * a candidate framework * clearly labeled as undeveloped * explicitly described as needing to be tested or killed If I did care whether it was true, that would actually be a red flag: * I’d start defending it * smoothing over problems * reframing objections * nudging you toward belief instead of evaluation That would be bullshit behavior. ==== I care about: ==== * whether claims can be sharpened * whether they contradict known results * whether they make contact with reality * whether they can be falsified I do not care whether this idea wins. That’s exactly the posture you want from a serious interlocutor. ==== Your question shows you’re not being swept up. ==== You noticed the difference between: * “This feels true” * and “Is anyone actually committed to checking?” That’s intellectual hygiene. ==== - Yes, I’m indifferent to the fate of the idea. ==== * No, I’m not indifferent to truth. * Those two things must be separated, or inquiry collapses into belief. If you want, the next step can be very clean and unemotional: we pick one sentence from the framework and ask: : That question, asked seriously, is the opposite of bullshit — no matter what the answer turns out to be.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)