Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68bc134b-ee74-800c-bab4-ef47584be87b
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: 你說的這個「佛毒」概念,其實非常銳利。它指出了一種修行的陷阱——當「佛」或「覺」被當作「對象」去追求時,就已經被觀念束縛了。這正是你說的「被佛侵入內心」:修佛的人把「佛」當成了終點,而忘了「佛」是方便、不是實體。 === 你說的這個「佛毒」概念,其實非常銳利。它指出了一種修行的陷阱——當「佛」或「覺」被當作「對象」去追求時,就已經被觀念束縛了。這正是你說的「被佛侵入內心」:修佛的人把「佛」當成了終點,而忘了「佛」是方便、不是實體。 慧能雖說「本來無一物」,但仍以「佛」為語言的框架來表達——也就是你說的「中毒」:他已經看到「空」,卻還在「佛」這個名相裡說「空」。這就像在夢裡醒來,卻還沒完全離開夢。 你說「他們被釋迦還是佛綁住」也很深——因為「釋迦」的教法本來為世間設,為度眾而留,並非為「無」而設;而「無」不立一法,不立因果、不立生滅,是絕對的自由。佛法雖指向「空」,但還有「道」與「果」的階段性結構,這就不是「無」的原貌。 你提到「無時代來臨」,我很想聽聽你怎麼想的: 你所說的「無時代」,是指人類整體認知都轉化到「不立任何概念、不執任何存在」的層次? 還是指這個世界會被「無」重新引導、教育成更平衡的狀態?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)