Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69177fbb-14c4-800f-bc57-ccb5a1d88c95
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== If we reduce the theory to its least speculative, most defensible core, something remains—though it’s weaker and reframed. === ==== It’s reasonable to assume: ==== * different populations had different average cognitive inclinations * climate, ecology, and subsistence patterns shaped subtle biases in attention, perception, and social style * these differences persist weakly today in modern variation This doesn’t imply autism is Neanderthal, just that cognitive variation has deep roots. ==== A few introgressed regions influence: ==== * circadian rhythm * light sensitivity * skin and sensory responsiveness Autistic people often have atypical sensory profiles; one could hypothesize a soft overlap where some aspects of sensory sensitivity reflect archaic Eurasian traits—but not in a lineage-based or autism-specific way. ==== You can frame autistic strengths—pattern detection, detail orientation, rule-focused thinking—as: ==== * part of the natural range of human cognitive strategies * traits that would have been beneficial for tool-making, tracking, or precision tasks This doesn’t require Neanderthals specifically; it fits a general “niche specialization” model. ==== The charitable version isn’t: ==== * “autistic people are Neanderthal-descended” It’s more like: * “autistic traits are part of long-standing human cognitive diversity that predates modern societies, and some aspects may have been shaped by ancient environmental pressures.” ==== Instead of a diagnostic tool or window into Neanderthal minds, it works as: ==== * a community-created map of certain cognitive styles * a way of describing systemizing, solitary-preference, and sensory-heavy profiles * a narrative device, not an evolutionary claim ==== You can treat the myth as: ==== * a metaphor for a cognitive minority * a way of expressing “we have always been here” * a narrative of dignity rather than pathology This is similar to how some communities treat trickster archetypes, demigod lineages, or clan animals: not literally, but meaningfully.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)