Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69569a57-79cc-8000-bf7e-5d4a3e894d0c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== In every §337 investigation, the ITC issues a Default Protective Order (DPO) very early (19 C.F.R. § 210.34). Parties can also negotiate modifications, but the core protections are standard. ==== ===== Documents are typically labeled: ===== * Confidential Business Information (CBI) * Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only (HC-AEO) Each tier strictly limits who can see the information. HC-AEO is the most important category, because: * It is not viewable by in-house counsel * It is not viewable by business personnel * Only outside counsel + approved experts may access it This is designed to prevent competitive misuse. ===== Information produced under the PO: ===== * May only be used for the ITC investigation * May not be used in district court, licensing talks, or business strategy * Cannot be shared with corporate decision-makers Violation = sanctions, disbarment risk, and contempt exposure So on paper, this is very strong protection. ===== The PO governs: ===== * Secure storage (encrypted systems) * No copying except as necessary * Mandatory return or destruction after the investigation ends * Written certification of destruction ===== If someone breaches the PO: ===== * Immediate ITC sanctions * Possible referral to state bars * Potential civil liability This is not theoretical — the ITC does enforce POs aggressively.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)