Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69427ee3-cac8-8007-9487-5c53f5d35bd7
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== ① 日本の不起訴処分の仕組み ===== 日本では検察官が以下の理由で不起訴を決定することがあります: * 証拠が不十分で有罪の見込みが低い * 犯罪の故意・認識が立証困難(疑わしきは被告人に有利) * 被疑者の事情(初犯・社会性など) * 公共の利益や捜査・立証コスト等の総合的判断 一般的に検察は、「合理的な疑いを超えて有罪を立証できる」証拠が必要とされ、日本の刑事司法ではこの立証基準が非常に厳格です(疑いの余地があれば不起訴の判断につながることがあります)。ただし、実際の不起訴理由の詳細は公表されないことが多いのが現状です。弁護士への相談ならデイライト法律事務所<ref>{{cite web|title=弁護士への相談ならデイライト法律事務所|url=https://www.daylight-law.jp/criminal/zaisan/setto/taiho/|publisher=daylight-law.jp|access-date=2025-12-23}}</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)