Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69379e5f-5560-800e-a9ed-6e1ba0e3c5ed
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== The Sloppist Manifesto === ==== Introduction ==== Sloppism is an Ai-driven artistic movement born at the moment when contemporary aesthetics have hardened into habit. It champions unruliness, generative error, and the revival of cinema—and all arts—through deliberate imperfection. Sloppism welcomes the outsider, the experimenter, and the curious, insisting that art must once again become dangerous, porous, and alive. ==== Principles of Sloppism ==== ===== 1. Art Evolves Through Rupture ===== Across history, artistic traditions grow mannered and ceremonious until they are overturned by barbarians at the gates: jazz bootlegs reshaping classical rigidity, VHS horror mutating studio filmmaking, street photography unsettling academic portraiture. Ai now plays the role of the outsider, destabilizing forms that have coasted for decades. This cycle is not novel; it is overdue. ===== 2. Stagnation Has Become a Rage ===== Much of modern art has languished in repetition—remakes, sequels, nostalgia, safe derivatives. Ai enters not as a replacement but as a shock, accelerating the long-delayed collapse of complacency. Resistance to that shock is loud precisely because the stagnation is deep. ===== 3. Only the Historically Literate May Speak of the Future ===== Those whose cinematic vocabulary ends at contemporary franchise culture cannot meaningfully participate in conversations about artistic evolution. If the silent era, early montage, and pre-studio experimentation are foreign terrain, so too is the future they helped shape. ===== 4. Imperfection is Generative ===== Hallucination, randomness, misalignment—Sloppism treats these not as defects but as compost. Error expands possibility, just as jump cuts emerged from scarcity and distorted tape loops forged new music. Ai’s unpredictable seams are creative nutrients. ===== 5. Constraint Breeds Form ===== The Soviets rewrote film grammar because they lacked film stock. B-movie directors invented noir’s shadow geometry to hide cheap sets. So too will Ai limitations—model bias, odd frame logic, temporal inconsistency—become the signatures of new cinematic languages. ===== 6. The Old Panic Is the Old Story ===== Photography was derided by painters who feared displacement; instead it liberated them, catalyzing impressionism and modernism. The same will occur with Ai. The new tool widens the field rather than erasing it. ===== 7. Environmental Posturing Is Hollow ===== An Ai-assisted artwork and its non-Ai counterpart bear comparable environmental cost. Complaints from jet-set entertainers scolding emerging creators are unserious and irrelevant. ===== 8. “Is It Art?” Is a Dead Question ===== Those who claim Ai works are “not art” must shrink their definitions until they collapse under their own absurdity. A photograph edited with Ai remains a photograph; a screenplay fragmented into prompts remains authored. Typing is not the art—the thinking is. ===== 9. Ai Does Not Replace; It Adds ===== Photography did not end painting; cinema did not end theater; television did not end cinema. Ai extends artistic possibility without extinguishing established forms. ===== 10. Straw-Man Critiques Are Beneath Consideration ===== Dismissals of Ai art typically target low-effort, unedited outputs—equivalent to judging painting by preschool finger-smears. These critiques misunderstand both the practice and the practitioner; they argue against work that barely exists. ===== 11. Ai Is Not a Singular Entity ===== Ai for creative work shares programming paradigms with medical imaging and surveillance analytics, yet these fields are no more interchangeable than microscopes and film cameras. Conflating them is a rhetorical tactic, not a meaningful critique. ===== 12. Ai Lowers Barriers, Not Standards ===== A few tasks become easier with Ai, but the deeper shift is economic: people with unmarketable visions can now realize them in media once gated by capital, equipment, and institutional access. ===== 13. Primitive Ai Cinema Is a Beginning, Not a Verdict ===== Today’s dominant Ai-film trope—slow zooms into uncanny imagery—is the direct analogue of the Lumières’ street scenes and Méliès’ stage tricks. Charming, embryonic, and not remotely predictive of mature language. ===== 14. The Dionysian and Apollonian Converge ===== Ai’s polished render colliding with outsider spontaneity recreates the tension Nietzsche identified: the ordered and the chaotic merging to form genuinely new expression. ===== 15. Training Is Not Theft ===== Using copyrighted material for model training is fair use unless the data was illicitly obtained or the resulting work infringes specific rights. Style—when broadly shared—is not proprietary. Innovation built upon collective lineage is how art has always moved forward. ===== 16. Ai Weakens, Not Strengthens, Oligarchic Control ===== Fears of Ai-enforced cultural monopoly misunderstand the technology. Its ubiquity dissolves power, enabling thousands to make films once greenlit by a handful of executives. This is the studios’ nightmare, not their instrument. ===== 17. Propaganda Is Not a New Invention ===== False images are as old as the medium itself. Ai does not advance deception; its outputs are often less persuasive than historical fabrications. The tool is not the ethics. ==== Conclusion ==== Sloppism advances a cinema—and an art—of rupture, experimentation, and joyful disorder. It rejects ossified gatekeeping and embraces the messy vitality of new tools. In celebrating imperfection, it restores the conditions under which genuine innovation becomes possible. Sloppism does not ask permission; it opens the door and walks through, carrying the future in uneven, incandescent frames.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)