Editing Openai/692c52e8-5230-800f-b92b-de25a0fe8d7e (section)

==== a. Typos in your “STUFF” example ====

: 
* you ➜ your
* contact ➜ contract

I’d also smooth the structure a bit:

: 

b. Overstatement: “trained on nearly the entire Internet”

: 

For a legal audience, this may read as factually wrong and trigger IP / confidentiality alarms. I’d soften it:
* “trained on huge volumes of public and licensed text, including much of the public internet” or
* “trained on massive datasets drawn from the public internet and other sources”

c. Slightly misleading strength claim

: 

For lawyers who are already worried about overclaiming, this is a bit strong. Benchmarking ≠ dependable legal work. Easy fix:
* “These AIs are the ones often approaching or matching human-level scores on many benchmarks. That doesn’t mean they’re always right, especially in law, but they’re usually your best option for complex reasoning.”

d. Jargon that may lose non-AI folks

A few terms might land as inside-baseball unless you add a 3-word gloss:
* “LLM” – spell out once: “large language model (LLM)”.
* “model selector” – a quick parenthetical: “(the dropdown where you pick which AI model to use)”.
* “LMArena Leaderboard” – lawyers won’t know what this is. - Maybe: “Many people look at public leaderboards like the LMSys / Chatbot Arena ‘Text’ ranking…” - Or just: “Check independent leaderboards and evaluations if you want to compare models.”

Not fatal, but worth one line of clarification.

e. Minor clarity tweaks
* “AI has a limited memory per chat…” – technically “context window,” but your message is right. I’d tweak for accuracy without adding complexity: >
* “Give the AI top credentials, so it grasps the desired level of expertise” – I’d make clear this is about tone and depth, not pretending it’s actually licensed: >