Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691a14bb-ac48-8008-85d0-2e4fb3f780d1
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== GPT-5 (low / medium / high reasoning) ===== * Pros: - Best at structured reasoning, complex refactoring, and long-context comprehension. - High-reasoning variant excels in debugging multi-file codebases and explaining architectural decisions. - Medium-reasoning offers nearly equal code accuracy at lower credit cost. * Cons: - Slower for small edits or single-function tasks. * Use: - High: full-system analysis, architectural planning, deep debugging. - Medium: mid-complex refactors, writing new modules. - Low: quick utility generation, single-function edits. GPT-5-Codex * Pros: Specialized for pure code completion, boilerplate generation, and syntax precision. * Cons: Weak reasoning; not ideal for architectural design or explanation. * Use: Code generation, scaffolding, template expansion. GPT-4o / GPT-4.1 * Pros: Fast, balanced generalist. Reliable language-code interleaving. * Cons: Narrower context, weaker long-term reasoning than GPT-5. * Use: Documentation writing, lightweight code reviews, mixed natural-language and code tasks. gpt-oss 120B (Medium) * Pros: Good for rapid prototyping and experimentation. * Cons: Inconsistent accuracy, occasional hallucinations. * Use: Sandbox code sketches or exploratory tasks.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)