Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: continuing the conversation ===
(continuing the conversation)
Loctarjay referred back to the entire comment Captain Blue wrote that started "imagine arguing against maths and then mocking...."
Loctarjay wrote this new comment:
Asking chatgpt:
* How unlikely is it for a source to be trustworthy it the sorce only shows evidence of confirmation bias, and the line of thinking shows indications of needing to add extra things to the evidence which does not factually have any evidence of being the case ?

Answer: The Likelihood for that souece to be trustworthy is very low

Next question:
* What if the source tries to expose "foul play" in sports, but every single time that source in confronted by an opposition, then the source outright just denies the opposition with 0 evidence for why the opposition is wrong and then just claims the source is still just. Does that decrease the likelihood of that source to be trustworthy ?

Answer: Yes - that significantly decreases the likelihood that the source is trustworthy

Next question:
* What if the source claims to have more than 4 years of documented "evidence" that it knows what "foul play" looks like, yet every single time an opposition looks at the "evidence", the opposition says that the "evidence" is insufficient and also explains why, yet the source is then claiming the opposition have an agenda against them (against the source). Does this decrease the likelihood of the source to be trustworthy ?

Answer: Yes - This further decreases the likelihood of the source to be trustworthy

Next question:
* At what point can you outright just ignore what that source have to say until the source starts giving indisputable / concrete evidence that the source has changed and knows what it is talking about ?

Answer: You can reasonably choose to ignore a source once it reaches the point where its behavior consistently shows that it is not operating in good faith, not providing evidence, and not correcting itself when shown to be wrong.

You don’t need to wait forever for “indisputable” proof—credible sources earn trust through patterns of behavior, and untrustworthy ones lose it the same way.

Conclusion
AI agrees that after a span of 4 years with 0 concrete evidence, you are not to be trusted in what you are trying to say.