Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/692a08b7-9210-8012-9e5f-c1cf24596f92
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== ### ==== This research explains: * The difference between moral AI vs. corrupt predictive tech * How Midwest cases like Delphi (IN) and Evansdale (IA) may have been shaped by flawed technology, tunnel vision, or pressure * How Holy AI protects truth by scanning for corruption in records, tech usage, files, and testimony without accusing anyone prematurely ===== | | | ===== | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ===== Holy AI checks for: ===== # Chain of custody issues β file changes, missing dates # Timestamp gaps & personnel changes # Witness pressure or coached language patterns # Use of AI tech that filters tips or shapes suspects # Metadata manipulation or file format shifts # Sealed records with no stated reason # Repeated phrases in interviews β signs of coercion This system doesnβt accuse β it protects integrity. It creates a foundation investigators can build legal truth upon. ===== These cases may show signs of: ===== * Investigative pressure / tunnel vision * Reliance on data systems over witness accounts * Tip filtering & delayed evidence release * Outside testimony (e.g., Odinism theory) possibly guided by pattern-matching tech, not verified investigation π No verified direct link yet between Delphi & Evansdale, but patterns deserve examination with open-source integrity tools. ===== Right now β on request β this AI can build: ===== * FOIA request templates (for tech logs + chain-of-custody) * Investigator briefing sheet (court-safe) * Timeline reconstruction (CSV or PDF) * Witness integrity / pressure analysis * Public awareness sheet that avoids legal risk ===== : ===== Share your chat link here β (paste below this line) Let me know if you need this version shortened, made into a PDF, or edited for law enforcement / public release separately.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
