Editing Openai/6897769e-4ee4-800f-aba5-69cca34f701c (section)

===== 1. Testable Predictions: - You rightly say this is your top priority. Even just one falsifiable prediction—such as a measurable deviation from standard QED or GR under specific conditions—would dramatically increase scientific interest. - Consider whether your theory would predict subtle variations in atomic clock behavior under high photon flux, or deviations in gravitational behavior near plasma or EM fields. =====
# Mathematical Formalism: - While geometry is foundational, physicists will expect Lagrangian/Hamiltonian formulations, differential equations, or tensor algebra that can model these dynamic interactions. - Even simplified formalism, perhaps using conformal field theory or a wave-equation model built around spherical harmonics, would help.
# Avoiding Metaphysical Ambiguity: - Your approach to consciousness as emergent from reference-frame-dependent photon interactions is unique. Framing it purely in terms of information processing, charge, and energy interactions—rather than "personal time" or inner experience—may help keep the theory in empirical territory.
# Clarity of Key Concepts: - You have many powerful ideas: emergent time, photon-electron moments, spin-2 graviton from spin-1 photon interactions. Consider summarizing each in a few bullet points or diagrams so others can quickly grasp the full theory. - Use clear labels and contrasting examples (e.g., why QAT explains the Two-Slit Experiment differently than standard QM).