Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: At this point Loctarjay's comment was number 118, and once again he was being ignored by Captain Blue, even though Capt… === At this point Loctarjay's comment was number 118, and once again he was being ignored by Captain Blue, even though Captain Blue was capable of responding with 2 other messages to others in the thread, so when the comment number reached 133, then Loctarjay wrote the 134th comment that said: Originally posted by Captain Blue: That's not AI proving me wrong... That's your opinion again.. (Captain Blue quote end) EVERY SINGLE ONE OF YOUR HACKUSATION VIDEOS ARE OPINIONATED There is 0 credible evidence Your videos are 110% assumptions, speculations and demand of desired actions You attempting to claim your "4 yours of video evidence" means anything is the biggest load of crap ever, because NOT ONCE have you ever returned to actually see how often the anti-cheat teams have agreed with you and made statistics out of it and neither are you objectively improving your analysis, you are however ALWAYS subjectively analysing everything. And further more...... You going through your own videos, claiming "cheater" in the moment and then from start to end of your edited videos claiming "cheater" is just a blatant display of confirmation bias There are absolutely 0 credibility about anything you are doing And no, this is not "just" me saying it... This is literally how you constructive credible research and sources = NEVER GO THROUGH YOUR OWN STUFF AND CLAIM IT IS VALID WITH 0 PEERS AGREEING
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)