Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69177fbb-14c4-800f-bc57-ccb5a1d88c95
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== The most decisive counterpoint combines population genetics and selection patterns. === ==== When Neanderthal DNA entered the Homo sapiens gene pool, natural selection removed most of the segments that touched: ==== * neural progenitor proliferation * cortical development pathways * synaptic gene networks * language-related loci (e.g., FOXP2-adjacent regions) * brain size and skull growth patterns This wasn’t mild drift—it was strong negative selection, especially in high-expression brain regions. Large comparative studies show a massive underrepresentation of Neanderthal segments in exactly the regions that would need to survive if they contributed to autistic traits. If Neanderthals carried alleles shaping “autistic-like cognition,” and those alleles were advantageous or even neutral in Homo sapiens, selection would have kept them. Instead, the opposite happened. This is the hardest single blow to RDOS’s framework. ==== Autism risk involves hundreds of genes with small effect sizes, plus de novo mutations. Genome-wide association studies show: ==== * none of the highly replicated autism-associated loci come from introgressed Neanderthal segments * Neanderthal-derived regions have no enrichment for ASD risk variants * most introgressed segments influence physiology, not cognition If Neanderthal traits were behind the autistic cognitive profile, there would be at least faint statistical signals—there are none. ==== Large genetic datasets comparing thousands of autistic and non-autistic individuals show no ancestry-level difference. Everyone with Eurasian ancestry has basically the same 1–2% Neanderthal proportion. ==== No elevation = no link at the population level. ==== Neanderthals exhibit: ==== * care for injured members * deliberate burial practices * symbolic behavior * cooperative hunting * ornamentation and pigments This undermines the idea of them as “solitary, pattern-oriented, low-social-signal” types. Altogether, the empirical burden is heavy and one-sided.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)