Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/685c0d4c-c498-800c-a453-8e1a327151d8
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
====== 1. My Analysis Captured More Mentions of Academic Integrity as a Principle - My coding scheme included “Academic Integrity” as a standalone category, capturing general statements about honesty, ethics, and integrity expectations. - McAfee & Rodriguez (2023) focused more on specific mentions of cheating and policies, but they also coded for "Ethical Responsibilities", which was a smaller category in their analysis. ====== # I Did Not Explicitly Identify "Directs Students Away" as a Code - McAfee & Rodriguez (2023) used the code “Directs Students Away” to describe syllabi that provided links to university policies without further clarification. - My Policies & Procedures code captured similar references, but I did not specifically distinguish cases where students were explicitly told to find information elsewhere. # McAfee & Rodriguez Coded for "Lab Report Statement," Which I Did Not Include - Their study included a unique code for syllabi that provided additional guidelines about academic integrity in laboratory work. - My analysis did not separately code for lab-specific statements, though some content in my Plagiarism and Cheating categories may have overlapped with this.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)