Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695158d7-1b68-800b-a02f-4817bf1f6d25
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Short: there’s no “two filesystems in the same partition” magical thing — you can only have one filesystem occupying a partition. But the terms you see are talking about two different layered concepts: === * btrfs partition (what you pick in the partition editor): you create a partition on disk and format it with the btrfs filesystem. That means the whole partition is a btrfs filesystem. * btrfs volume / subvolume (internal to btrfs): inside a btrfs filesystem you create subvolumes (sometimes shown as “volumes” in GUIs). Subvolumes act like independent mountable roots but they live inside the single btrfs filesystem (they are not separate partitions). btrfs also supports multiple devices combined into a btrfs pool, RAID levels, etc. So: * If the GUI shows both options for the same slice of disk, it likely means (a) create a partition and (b) create a btrfs filesystem on it and then optionally create subvolumes inside it. You cannot have a separate ext4 and btrfs both on the same partition — you must pick one filesystem per partition. If you want LVM + encryption, that’s a different model: LVM gives you logical volumes (LVs) that look like separate block devices and you can format each LV with ext4 / btrfs etc. btrfs subvolumes are more akin to directories with special semantics, not block-device LVs.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)