Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== User: Captain BLue quotes Loctarjay "I just want to highlight that I wanted a 3rd party analysis of how me and Captain Blue a… ===
Captain BLue quotes Loctarjay "I just want to highlight that I wanted a 3rd party analysis of how me and Captain Blue argue against each other, PURELY based on this thread and nothing else

The result = https://ibb.co/Lz8cX154
Captain Blue have reached a point, based on this analytical tool, where it says that everything he says should never be trusted.

This is the analytical frame at which BOTH me and Captain Blue are being analysed = https://ibb.co/Hp9nQhZz
Analytical Frame (unchanged)
Credibility is assessed on:
* Logical coherence
* Correct use of evidence
* Distinction between existence vs prevalence claims
* Avoidance of fallacies (strawman, goalpost shifting, false dilemma, equivocation)
* Falsifiability and proportional reasoning
Tone, insults, and emotional intensity do not affect score unless they directly impair reasoning.

So analysed using a 3rd party tool that is asked to be 100% neutral with 0 bias towards either of us, then it says
Loctarjay — 86 / 100
* Clear, consistent claim
* Separates existence of cheating from prevalence
* Uses falsifiable, evidence-based reasoning
* Correctly identifies fallacies
* Minor deduction only for emotional escalation (does not break logic)

Captain Blue — 0 / 100
* Repeated strawman and false dilemma
* Treats disagreement as proof of opponent’s belief
* Uses non-quantifying facts to justify numeric claims
* Refuses falsifiability and misrepresents positions
* Argument structure collapses regardless of topic

DO NOT take my words at face value, but at least be skeptical towards people blindly claiming the opposition are liars"
Captain BLue responded: "Oh look loctar not staying on topic and using AI as an authority.

I only used AI as calculator and gather information. Not Loctar though full blown appeal to authority. he inserts biased data then when he makes it public and you tell AI the correct information AI sides with me and says Loctar Is not credible and is maliciously attacking me.

Then Loctar deletes the conversation and tries to recreate the whole conversation then points out differences in the new conversation he generated than the original one I showed in video. Then uses his newly generated conversation to claim mine is the fabricated one.

All of this has nothing to do with the thread and is all fallacious moving goal posts, personal attacks and using AI as an authority.

I really don't know what he gets out of being proven wrong over and over again.

All he can do is format his fallacious text in different sizes and colour as a cheap trick to appear more credible. Because his words are hallow. Just running around in circles with nothing to say.

Somehow he thinks he's getting something out of this but all he does his run his head into the truth. Then just spins the wheel all over again expecting a different result....

You can't win, You have no argument."

Loctarjay quoted Captain Blue "Oh look loctar not staying on topic and using AI as an authority. "
Loctarjay responded: "Oh look, Captain Blue blatantly lying about what is going on because he has 0 valid arguments against anything I say"
Loctarjay quoted himself 2 times in order to prove that Captain Blue is lying about the usage of AI:
# When I reached the end of page 48 (reference comment at the bottom)
When I reached the end of page 48 (reference comment at the bottom)
The AI used as an analytical tool was asked to calculate credibility with "0 = should never be trusted at any cost" and "100 = should blindly be trusted no matter what they say"
# So simply inputting nothing but mere comments, with nothing else, will have an analytical tool say you're not credible🤦
Loctarjay responded: "I will just ignore the rest of your entire comment of pure lies.....
There is absolutely no logical reason to argue against nothingness and lies.
If you are gonna stay on topic and you stop lying, then we can have a discussion....
Until then... yeah... good luck"