Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69401093-f800-800a-94fc-a5d69db9f764
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== コモディティを投資として扱う場合、現物を抱えるのは最も運用難度が高い形です。代替として、先物・ETF/ETC等の金融手段もありますが、こちらは別のコストが出ます。 ==== ===== - 倉庫・保険・検査の重い固定費を回避しやすい ===== * ただし「ロールコスト(限月乗換)」が発生し、コンタンゴ局面では継続的に削られる(実質的な“管理費”) ===== - 手数料(信託報酬)+ロール要因(商品設計による) ===== * 現物保管型のETFは、保管費が手数料に内包されていると考えるべき 結論として、 * 「投資目的(ヘッジ・分散・インフレ耐性)」なら、現物を厚く抱える合理性は薄く、金融手段中心が通常は合理的 * 「供給制約を握る」「戦略備蓄的に確保する」「特定の実需で使う」など、現物保有に意味がある場合だけ現物へ寄せる という切り分けが必要です。
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)