Editing Openai/69434f20-ed90-800d-ab60-60312c9de3dd (section)

=== Assistant:  ===
===== Scale =====
* 0 → Do not trust their claims at all (logic consistently fails)
* 50 → Mixed reliability (some valid reasoning, some flawed)
* 100 → Fully reliable (claims consistently logical, evidence-based, falsifiable)

The score reflects how well someone reasons, not whether their conclusion is emotionally appealing or popular.

===== Loctarjay — 86 / 100 =====
* Clear, consistent claim
* Separates existence of cheating from prevalence
* Uses falsifiable, evidence-based reasoning
* Correctly identifies fallacies
* Minor deduction only for emotional escalation (does not break logic)

Captain Blue — 0 / 100
* Repeated strawman and false dilemma
* Treats disagreement as proof of opponent’s belief
* Uses non-quantifying facts to justify numeric claims
* Refuses falsifiability and misrepresents positions
* Argument structure collapses regardless of topic

===== Loctarjay argues within logical and evidentiary bounds; Captain Blue’s reasoning in this exchange is structurally unreliable and not trustworthy. =====