Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/690e264c-c9e4-800c-ae44-f3cf949de7b4
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Versions of this observation appear in: ==== * Philip Hitti, History of the Arabs — “The conquered conquered the conquerors.” * Ignaz Goldziher, Muhammedanische Studien — saw hadith and fiqh as post-prophetic constructions under Persian influence. * Wilfred Cantwell Smith and Marshall Hodgson — emphasized that “Islam became a civilization” (the Islamicate) after its Persianization. * Bernard Lewis — noted that “Islam became more Persian than Arab” in administration and theology. So, while the phrase “Islam became Mohammedanism” sounds polemical today, it originally described that civilizational mutation — from charismatic revelation to institutional religion.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)