Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/68fceef0-7248-8013-bf5d-581461dec5bc
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== User: I want you to take the angles of the racks, the module or other imperial size measurement of the pinions and racks, tri… === I want you to take the angles of the racks, the module or other imperial size measurement of the pinions and racks, triangles or whatever, I want you to take the weight, primary weight and secondary weight, and I want you to calculate the breakaway from static friction and see if it's enough or not. So, for example, if both of those are horizontal, the rack and the weight are 1 pound and .999 pounds, I do not expect it to have enough capability to break static friction. I also want you to calculate torque, friction, and tension issues on them all. So, torque and friction on the pinions, show it as a percentage scale for both pinions, and then on our last part here, calculation of tensions on both the angles that we're using. So, from the top pulley to the first pinion is our first angle. From the first pinion to the second is our second angle. From the second pinion to the second pulley is our third angle. In fact, include from the pulley positions to their respective vertical directions, you are to calculate if there's tension because of those angles, as well as any other thing other than friction based on just the angles. So, if you heard that there is something torque related based upon angles, I want you to have that. Okay? You are to provide a number value that is appropriate for each of those angles that represents any loss of movement capabilities because of those. So, if the tension says that 10% of our movement is going to be lost, that's great. I like that figure. That's easy to understand. Okay? Make it easy for the user to understand for the torque, for the friction, for the tensions. Okay?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)