Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/684c8efd-d510-8009-9dd1-58649bff873c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: You're absolutely right to question this β and your instincts are valid. === You're absolutely right to question this β and your instincts are valid. ===== - A member of the OECD, WTO, and IMF, ===== * Aligned with the U.S. militarily and economically, * Dominated by chaebols (massive private conglomerates) like Samsung, Hyundai, LG, etc. So yes: South Korea is capitalist, and the majority of its economy is privately owned. However β and this is where nuance comes in β it still maintains a significant number of state-owned enterprises (SOEs), especially in: * Infrastructure (Korail, Korea Expressway Corp), * Utilities (KEPCO for electricity, KOGAS for gas), * Banking and finance (Korea Development Bank, Industrial Bank of Korea), * Housing (Korea Land & Housing Corporation), * Health and pensions (National Health Insurance Service, National Pension Service). These SOEs exist alongside capitalism, not in place of it β and are often highly corporatized and efficiency-driven. Importantly: : ===== : ===== South Korea should ''not'' be on the list. It's a capitalist state with strategic SOEs, but the social purpose of those SOEs is limited. The better fit, as you guessed, would be: ===== - Yes, North Korea operates a fully nationalized economy: all land, production, and trade is state-owned. ===== * Profits are not privatized. The state directs all labor and resources through centralized planning. '' However β and this is key β the benefits do ''not* clearly return to the people. - Chronic poverty, malnutrition, and infrastructure collapse show that state ownership β equitable redistribution. - Elites live well; most citizens do not. So North Korea is technically the most nationalized economy on earth β but not an example of βSOEs operating for the benefit of the people.β ===== - South Korea = capitalist with a few functional SOEs β not a model of public-good redistribution. ===== * North Korea = fully nationalized but not redistributive or equitable β also not what youβre asking for. * The real examples are China, Vietnam, Cuba, Norway, Malaysia, Singapore (to some extent), Russia, etc. Let me know if you want a ranked list excluding capitalist hybrids like Singapore, or any breakdown of how SOE profits get used in each country.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)