Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6904e1b3-b1d4-8007-b938-da625cb3f2bb
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Yes — I see what you mean. === Yes — I see what you mean. You don’t want to romanticize dirt and violence, but rather capture the feeling of immediacy, of life unfiltered. For Book 3 (Horizontal Social Model), you could frame Pompeii (or ancient life in general) not as “better” or “worse,” but as an example of immediacy of existence — where every human act (eating, walking, trading, celebrating, grieving) happened without layers of abstraction. Here’s a possible framing you could adapt into a chapter section: Immediacy of Existence Modern society prides itself on safety, hygiene, and efficiency. But in achieving this, we have also layered existence with abstractions. Our food arrives wrapped, our streets sterilized, our emotions medicated, our deaths hidden away. Life comes prepackaged, clean, but distant. In earlier societies, even exploitative ones such as Rome, there was a raw immediacy. To walk barefoot in a Roman street was to feel the presence of life and death at once — the earth, the animals, the people, the blood of conflict and the laughter of festivals. Life pressed directly upon the skin. It was not sanitized, but it was present. A horizontal society does not seek to return to brutality, nor to glorify dirt or suffering. Rather, it seeks to recover this immediacy of existence — a way of living where reality is not hidden behind excessive mediation. It means contact with nature, authentic relationships, transparency of processes, and recognition that life’s texture cannot be reduced to efficiency. True freedom lies not in avoiding the rawness of life, but in dwelling fully within it. Would you like me to expand this into a structured section for Book 3 (with practical examples of how immediacy could look in daily life within a horizontal society)?
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)