Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69596681-3f7c-8006-b9fd-01d9d8191763
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: === ===== We construct a deterministic four-dimensional phase space with coordinates (p,τ0,n,τ)(p,\tau_0,n,\tau)(p,τ0,n,τ), where ppp denotes the precision index, τ0\tau_0τ0 the initial structural tolerance, nnn the cumulative experiment count, and τ\tauτ the effective tolerance after refinement and accumulation. Precision refinement is modeled as multiplicative contraction by a factor 2−p2^{-p}2−p, representing systematic increases in measurement resolution. ===== Experiment accumulation enters through a logarithmic erosion factor κ(n)=1−αlog (1+nn0),\kappa(n)=1-\alpha\log\!\left(1+\frac{n}{n_0}\right),κ(n)=1−αlog(1+n0n), with fixed parameters α∈(0,1)\alpha\in(0,1)α∈(0,1) and n0>0n_0>0n0>0. This choice ensures sublinear tightening with experiment count and a finite exhaustion horizon. For naive scaling, the effective tolerance is τnaive(p,τ0,n)=τ0 2−p κ(n),\tau_{\mathrm{naive}}(p,\tau_0,n)=\tau_0\,2^{-p}\,\kappa(n),τnaive(p,τ0,n)=τ02−pκ(n), which defines a family of smooth tolerance surfaces indexed by discrete nnn. Collapse is defined deterministically by comparison to a fixed residual bound ∣r∣max|r|_{\max}∣r∣max. The collapse condition τ<∣r∣max\tau<|r|_{\max}τ<∣r∣max corresponds geometrically to intersection with a horizontal absorbing boundary plane in (p,τ0,τ)(p,\tau_0,\tau)(p,τ0,τ) space. For each experiment count nnn, this intersection occurs at a finite precision index p\''(τ0,n)=log2 (τ0 κ(n)∣r∣max),p^\''(\tau_0,n)=\log_2\!\left(\frac{\tau_0\,\kappa(n)}{|r|_{\max}}\right),p\*(τ0,n)=log2(∣r∣maxτ0κ(n)), which decreases monotonically with increasing nnn, yielding a finite experiment horizon beyond which collapse is unavoidable for any nonzero precision. For comparison, an infrared fixed-point scaling is defined by τIR(p,τ0)=τ\''+(τ0−τ\'')2−p,τ\''≥∣r∣max,\tau_{\mathrm{IR}}(p,\tau_0)=\tau^\''+(\tau_0-\tau^\*)2^{-p}, \qquad \tau^\''\ge |r|_{\max},τIR(p,τ0)=τ\''+(τ0−τ\'')2−p,τ\''≥∣r∣max, which is independent of nnn and never intersects the collapse boundary. This surface forms a time-invariant, non-collapsing region of the phase space. The rendered 4D projection embeds (p,τ0,τ)(p,\tau_0,\tau)(p,τ0,τ) explicitly and represents the fourth dimension nnn as discrete stacked surfaces. All quantities are computed analytically; no stochastic elements, fitting procedures, or optimization objectives are introduced. The geometry therefore provides an exact, visual representation of the theory’s collapse criteria and stopping rules. © Robert R. Frost 2026-01-03
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)