Editing Openai/6973e373-2b8c-800d-84b7-d7001cfc6bac (section)

==== If you want a version that’s almost impossible for critics to swat away: ====
# We do not need certainty about intent.
# We test repair.
# Repeated repair refusal + narrative substitution = effective self-protection loop.
# That loop reliably predicts continued unproductive discourse and safety risk in a harm-reduction space.
# Therefore moderation action is justified on function and trajectory, not tone.

That’s the “dots” connected without overclaiming inner mind access.

If you want, choose one and I’ll help you formalize it into something you can reuse publicly (reply with a number):
# A short “Repair Test Doctrine” paragraph you can pin or paste into mod comments.
# A CTDST-aligned “Stage fragility under threat” explanation (skill-at-worst-case, regression markers).
# A compact “Meta-cluster checklist” that stays 100% behavior-based (no tone, no mind-reading, no psych labels).