Editing Openai/68543586-b3fc-8004-86a9-b3760b4894b0 (section)

=== Assistant: Thank you for providing these two highly relevant screenshots. ===
Thank you for providing these two highly relevant screenshots. After analyzing them in context with the bankruptcy and Clickerr transition, here is a clear breakdown:

==== ### ====
# Screenshot 1 – CHM Dashboard Message (conversionhousemedia.net) - Users are told they must pay $19.77/month to retain access to CHM. - It includes features like: - Commission tracking - Referral program access - Email marketing tools (previously tied to Cliqly) - This is being presented as a “membership fee” and implies restricted access unless payment is made.
# Screenshot 2 – Redirect to WHOP Checkout - When users click to pay, they are sent to a WHOP checkout page. - The checkout URL shows a Clickerr-associated “$37 Weekly Membership” with the $19.77 CHM charge clearly shown as part of the bundled access.

==== ### ====
* CHM (Conversion House Media) was listed as a d/b/a of DE Marketing LLC in the official bankruptcy filings.
* That means CHM is part of the bankruptcy estate, and any related tools, platforms, subscriber data, or branding must be disclosed and preserved for the trustee.

===== - Clickerr’s use of WHOP as a payment gateway is new, and part of the Clickerr business launch strategy. =====
* This shows: - Clickerr controls or resells access to CHM - The CHM infrastructure is still live and monetized, but not disclosed as an asset

===== - Selling access to CHM from outside the estate (via Clickerr) may be a fraudulent transfer or concealment. =====
* This behavior supports the need for a Rule 2004 examination and may be grounds for asset recovery by the trustee under: - 11 U.S.C. § 541 (estate property) - 11 U.S.C. § 542 (turnover of property) - 11 U.S.C. § 548 (fraudulent transfers)

==== Yes — this directly ties CHM (an asset of DE Marketing) to the Clickerr brand, and shows that the new company: ====
* Is using WHOP to monetize what should be part of the bankruptcy estate
* Is offering access under a bundled plan not disclosed to the court
* Is continuing to generate revenue from legacy operations without creditor oversight

Would you like this analysis turned into Exhibit H as a Word/PDF document for your evidence binder?