Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/685c0d4c-c498-800c-a453-8e1a327151d8
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
===== 1. More Detailed and Educational Approaches to Academic Integrity - Instead of only listing penalties, syllabi could include educational explanations about why integrity matters, how to properly cite sources, and how to avoid common pitfalls. - Faculty could consider embedding real-world examples or discussing academic integrity early in the semester. ===== # More Explicit Faculty Engagement in Academic Integrity - Instructors could go beyond stating penalties and instead discuss how they support academic integrity, such as office hours for plagiarism concerns or guidance on exam preparation. - Training for faculty on how to communicate and enforce these policies could help standardize expectations. # Better Integration of Plagiarism Awareness - Since plagiarism was mentioned less often than cheating, institutions might need to reinforce plagiarism prevention strategies in courses, especially those with writing components. - Providing links to university resources, plagiarism detection tools, or clear guidelines on citation within syllabi could help bridge this gap. # Clarifying the Role of Technology in Academic Misconduct - Since unauthorized materials (e.g., graphing calculators, phones) were sometimes mentioned, syllabi should provide clearer guidelines on technology use. - Explicit policies on AI tools, online resources, and ethical use of digital aids could be incorporated into future syllabi.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)