Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/69728272-b4ec-8002-a97f-4631f7a0dccf
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: That line is one of Isocrates’ most famous—and most radical—ideas. === That line is one of Isocrates’ most famous—and most radical—ideas. In context, he’s saying that “Greekness” is not blood, but paideia (education, culture, shared intellectual life). To Isocrates, being Greek meant participating in a way of thinking: rhetoric, philosophy, civic values, language, and education—not being born to Greek parents. A few key layers to it: * Break with ethnic essentialism: In a world where identity was usually tied to ancestry, this was a bold move. Isocrates reframes identity as learned, not inherited. * Cultural universalism (with limits): He’s not saying everyone already is Greek—he’s saying anyone can become Greek by adopting Greek education and values. * Political purpose: Isocrates wanted unity among Greek city-states and influence beyond them. This definition allowed Greeks to lead culturally without relying on pure lineage. * Long afterlife: Romans loved this idea. It later shaped concepts of civilization, citizenship, and even modern debates about national identity and integration. In modern terms, he’s arguing that culture and education can outweigh ethnicity—a surprisingly contemporary thought for the 4th century BC. If you want, I can: * unpack the original Greek phrasing and its nuances, * compare this to Plato or Aristotle’s views on identity, * or connect it to modern ideas of civic vs ethnic nationalism.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)