Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/6970005d-f930-800c-bc75-b44638ae2546
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short, honest answer: I don’t have a single fixed number you can rely on. === Short, honest answer: I don’t have a single fixed number you can rely on. Longer, tell-it-like-it-is answer 👇 ===== - I can generally handle on the order of ''hundreds of thousands of tokens'' in a single conversation. ===== * The exact limit isn’t exposed to me (or you), and it can vary by: - deployment, - features in use (tools, images, system instructions), - and how the conversation is structured. ===== - Recent messages are weighted more heavily than very old ones. ===== * Very long conversations may have earlier details summarized or deprioritized rather than dropped outright. * If something is important, repeating or restating it is never a bad idea—it’s like pinning it to the fridge instead of assuming I’ll remember it from six weeks ago. ===== If you’re thinking in human terms: ===== * ✅ A whole novel? Fine. * ✅ A big codebase or long design doc? Usually fine. * ⚠️ A months-long chat where nothing is reiterated? That’s where entropy sneaks in. If you want, I can also explain: * how token counting roughly works, * how to structure prompts to maximize effective memory, * or how this compares to older GPT-4–era models (spoiler: it’s not even close). In short: big enough to be dangerous, but not magic 😄
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)