Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/695f02d3-11f8-800e-993a-ad71db6d42aa
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Here’s a clear explanation of how a hazard ratio HR like 0.636 is calculated and what it means — especially in the cont… === Here’s a clear explanation of how a hazard ratio (HR) like 0.636 is calculated and what it means — especially in the context of a clinical trial such as the SLS Phase 3 REGAL trial. ==== A hazard ratio compares the instantaneous risk of an event (e.g., death, progression, relapse) between two groups over time. It’s used in survival analysis and typically estimated using a statistical model such as the Cox proportional hazards model. Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> ==== * HR = 1.0 → no difference in hazard between groups * HR < 1.0 → event occurs less often in the treatment group vs. control * HR > 1.0 → event occurs more often in the treatment group vs. control Cancer.gov<ref>{{cite web|title=Cancer.gov|url=https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/hazard-ratio|publisher=cancer.gov|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> ==== In practice, hazard ratios are not computed by a simple ratio of two median survival times. Instead, they are estimated from time-to-event data across the entire follow-up period. ==== ===== If a Cox model is used (as in most Phase 3 oncology trials), it works like this: ===== # Define the hazard function At time ttt, the hazard is the instantaneous risk of the event happening at that time, given that the person has survived up to ttt. Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> # Model the log hazard as a linear function of treatment The model estimates a coefficient (β\betaβ) for the treatment effect. # Exponentiate that coefficient The hazard ratio = eβe^{\beta}eβ. Easy Made Stat<ref>{{cite web|title=Easy Made Stat|url=https://help.easymedstat.com/support/solutions/articles/77000513111-how-to-calculate-hazard-ratios-hr-in-a-cox-model-|publisher=Easy Made Stat|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> • If β\betaβ is negative → HR < 1 (treatment reduces risk) • If β\betaβ is positive → HR > 1 (treatment increases risk) This is how the HR comes out mathematically. > ==== In the REGAL trial context (from the November 14, 2022 press release): ==== * An HR of 0.636 means that, at any point in time, patients in the treatment arm (e.g., GPS) had about 36% lower hazard (instantaneous risk) of death than patients in the control arm (e.g., BAT). * This is a relative measure over the entire follow-up period under the proportional hazards assumption (i.e., the ratio is constant over time). Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> So the trial planners prespecified that an HR ≤ 0.636 would be the threshold for demonstrating statistically significant improvement in overall survival (OS). ==== While median survival times might be reported (e.g., OS ~12.6 vs. 8 months), the hazard ratio does not come directly from those medians. Rather: ==== * The Cox model uses all survival times and censoring information across both groups. * The hazard ratio is an overall measure of relative risk over time, not a simple ratio of medians. wiki.socr.umich.edu<ref>{{cite web|title=wiki.socr.umich.edu|url=https://wiki.socr.umich.edu/index.php/SMHS_SurvivalAnalysis|publisher=wiki.socr.umich.edu|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> If you do convert medians into an approximate HR under simple exponential assumptions, there are formulas — but this is not how the final HR is usually derived in modern trials. ==== ✅ HR is a ratio of instantaneous event rates, not a ratio of survival probabilities at a fixed timepoint. Wikipedia<ref>{{cite web|title=Wikipedia|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_ratio|publisher=en.wikipedia.org|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> ==== ✅ It’s estimated via a regression model (Cox model), usually by exponentiating the treatment coefficient β\betaβ. Easy Made Stat<ref>{{cite web|title=Easy Made Stat|url=https://help.easymedstat.com/support/solutions/articles/77000513111-how-to-calculate-hazard-ratios-hr-in-a-cox-model-|publisher=Easy Made Stat|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> ✅ HR < 1 indicates benefit for the treatment over control. Statistical Aid: A School of Statistics<ref>{{cite web|title=Statistical Aid: A School of Statistics|url=https://www.statisticalaid.com/hazard-ratio/|publisher=Statistical Aid: A School of Statistics|access-date=2026-01-10}}</ref> If you want, I can walk you through a numerical example — e.g., how the Cox model estimates β from a small dataset and turns that into an HR. Just let me know!
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)