Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/693e4db6-87cc-8008-beb8-1e28721c2e65
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Pertanyaan ini masuk akal banget, dan jawabannya memang strategi—bukan kebetulan. === Pertanyaan ini masuk akal banget, dan jawabannya memang strategi—bukan kebetulan. Walaupun iBox dan Erafone sama-sama di bawah Erajaya Group, peran brand-nya sengaja dibuat “tidak ramah” satu sama lain. Berikut penjelasan yang paling relevan secara strategi marketing & channel management 👇 ==== | | | | ==== | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | | | 👉 iBox tidak ingin dianggap “toko HP biasa” 👉 Erafone tidak ingin terlihat eksklusif & mahal Kalau terlalu “ramah” (saling rekomendasi, saling promosi), posisi brand jadi blur. ==== Ini poin penting. ==== Apple sangat ketat soal: * Experience toko * Cara promosi * Diskon * Bundling * Cross-selling ke non-Apple store Kalau iBox: * Terlalu sering mengarahkan ke Erafone * Diskon agresif seperti Erafone * Terlihat “satu ekosistem promo” ➡️ status Apple Premium Partner bisa terancam Makanya: * Promo iBox = halus, cicilan, trade-in * Promo Erafone = cashback, diskon, bundling ==== Erajaya sengaja membuat kompetisi internal: ==== : * Customer price-sensitive → Erafone * Customer experience-driven → iBox Ini mirip Toyota vs Lexus, walau satu grup. ==== Kalau iBox terlalu dekat dengan Erafone: ==== ❌ “Ah, sama aja kaya Erafone, ngapain beli di sini?” Padahal iBox menjual: * Trust * Prestige * After-sales * Ekosistem Apple Maka dibuat: * Store terpisah * Sales approach beda * Bahkan karyawan dilarang saling arahkan ==== Walau satu grup: ==== * KPI iBox ≠ KPI Erafone * Target margin ≠ target volume * Supplier governance beda Secara internal: * Mereka tidak di-reward untuk saling membantu ==== : ==== Bukan konflik internal, tapi: ✔️ Proteksi brand Apple ✔️ Segmentasi market ✔️ Strategi margin ✔️ Psikologi konsumen Kalau mau, saya bisa jelaskan: * 📊 kenapa harga iBox sering lebih mahal tapi tetap laku * 🧠 kenapa Apple anti diskon besar * 🏬 kenapa iBox store layout “dingin & bersih” * 🔮 apakah iBox & Erafone bakal digabung di masa depan Tinggal bilang mau bahas yang mana.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)