Editing Openai/6924739c-2300-800e-9743-65c152c213f1 (section)

=== Assistant: Short answer: I don’t see any legal authority cited from outside the United States in this brief. ===
Short answer: I don’t see any legal authority cited from outside the United States in this brief.

Here’s what I checked and what I found:
# Table of Authorities – Cases - The cases listed are all from U.S. courts – U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Courts of Appeals (2d, 3d, 6th, 9th, 11th, D.C. Cir.), U.S. District Courts, and similar, e.g.: - Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994) - Google LLC v. Oracle Am., Inc., 593 U.S. 1 (2020) - Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015) - Dam Things from Denmark v. Russ Berrie & Co., 290 F.3d 548 (3d Cir. 2002) – note this is a Third Circuit decision; “from Denmark” is just part of the party’s name, not a foreign court. 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted  2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted - I did not see any citations to foreign courts (e.g., UK courts, CJEU, Canadian Supreme Court, etc.) or to non-U.S. reporters.
# Statutes and Rules - The jurisdictional and statutory references are to U.S. federal law, such as: - 28 U.S.C. §§ 1292, 1331, 1338 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted - 17 U.S.C. provisions discussed throughout the brief. - Court rules cited are likewise U.S. rules (Fed. R. App. P., Fed. R. Civ. P., Third Circuit rules, etc.). 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted I did not see any references to foreign statutes (e.g., UK CDPA, EU directives, civil codes from other countries).
# Other Authorities - The “Other Authorities” section includes things like Nimmer on Copyright (a U.S. copyright treatise) and similar sources. 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted - These are secondary sources but still U.S.-oriented; there are no international conventions (e.g., Berne Convention, TRIPS, WIPO treaties) or foreign law texts listed.
# Body of the Brief - In the narrative sections (Statement of the Case, Argument, etc.), the legal analysis is built on the same U.S. authorities identified in the Table of Authorities and on U.S. statutory law. 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted - I ran targeted searches within the document for terms that would typically signal foreign or international law (e.g., “Canada,” “United Kingdom,” “European,” “treaty,” “Berne,” “TRIPS,” “international,” “foreign law”) and did not find citations or discussion of non-U.S. legal regimes. 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted
# Non-U.S. ''names'' that are not foreign authority - The caption includes Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH, and there is the case Dam Things from Denmark v. Russ Berrie & Co. mentioned above. Those references simply reflect party or corporate names (or foreign corporate forms), not foreign courts or foreign law being relied upon as authority. 2025-11-19-ROSS-Oppo-Redacted

Bottom line:
All of the legal authorities actually cited as such in this brief are U.S. courts, U.S. statutes, U.S. rules, and U.S.-oriented secondary sources. I do not see any reliance on legal authority from a source outside the United States.