Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
freem
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Openai/691c85a3-9588-8002-b8be-490af2c3e56c
(section)
Add languages
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Assistant: Short answer: No, it’s not accurate – biologically or historically. === Short answer: No, it’s not accurate – biologically or historically. And the claim that humans “weren’t designed” to live beyond post-menopause has no scientific basis. It’s a modern myth that keeps being recycled online. Here’s the clearer, biology-accurate version: ==== 1. Humans have always had the biological capacity to reach post-menopause ==== Archaeology, skeletal records, and demographic reconstructions show many people with ovaries regularly lived into their 50s, 60s, and beyond in pre-industrial societies. What makes it look like people “died young” is this: * Child mortality rates were extremely high. This drags down the average lifespan dramatically. * But if someone survived childhood, pregnancy risks, and infections, it was common to reach 60+. This is called the mortality curve fallacy: confusing average age at death with typical lifespan for those who survived early-life risks. ==== 2. There is no evidence that the ovaries were ever “designed to shut down before death” ==== Biologically: * Menopause is part of the ovarian ageing trajectory, not a design flaw. * Post-ovulatory years appear in humans across time, geography, and culture. * There are well-established evolutionary theories (e.g. Grandmother hypothesis, intergenerational care models) showing that post-reproductive adults have played valuable biological and social roles in human communities. ==== 3. What the historical data actually show ==== Across ancient and pre-modern populations: * If someone reached age 30, they often lived another 20–30 years. * Skeletal remains from hunter-gatherers, medieval communities, and early agricultural societies consistently show adults living into their 60s and sometimes 70s. * There are documented individuals reaching 80+ long before modern medicine. So the idea that “people didn’t live past 50 until recently” is a misunderstanding created by statistical averages distorted by early mortality. ==== 4. Why the myth keeps resurfacing ==== Because it: * oversimplifies biology * misunderstands historical data * aligns with outdated, patriarchal narratives about the “purpose” of people with ovaries * ignores the fact that menopause and post-menopause have been natural human life stages for thousands of years If you’d like, I can give you a short myth-busting paragraph you can post online in your tone, or a mini graphic caption for a reel debunking this elegantly.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to freem are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (see
Freem:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)